Significant appellate cases:
Eclairs Group Limited v JKX Oil & Gas Plc [2014] 1 BCLC 202 (Mann J. – Chancery Division); [2014] 2 BCLC 164 (Court of Appeal); [2016] 1 BCLC 1 (Supreme Court)
Questions whether a power in articles of association to impose voting and transfer restrictions in relation to shares had arisen and, if so, whether it was exercised for a proper purpose.
Stansell Ltd v Co-operative Group (CWS) Ltd [2006] 1 BCLC 401 (Blackburne J. – Chancery Division); [2006] 1 WLR 1704 (Court of Appeal)
Question concerning the operation of a transfer of engagements under Section 51 of the Industrial and Provident Societies Act 1965 (now Section 110 of the Co-operative and Community Benefit Societies Act 2014) in relation to a construction contract containing a prohibition on assignment.
EIC v Phipps [2004] 2 BCLC 589 (Neuberger J. – Chancery Division); [2005] 1 WLR 1377 (Court of Appeal)
Question whether a bonus issue was valid; involving issues of shareholder approval, common mistake and Section 35A of the Companies Act 1985 (now Section 40 of the Companies Act 2006).
Rose v Lynx Express Ltd [2004] 1 BCLC 455 (Court of Appeal)
Application for disclosure, under CPR 31.16, before proceedings started; depending on whether it was properly arguable with a real prospect of success that pre-emption provisions had been triggered.
Villatte v 38 Cleveland Square Management Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1549 (Court of Appeal)
Question whether proceedings in a company’s name were duly authorised; issues of acquiescence in the appointment of its directors, the scope of regulation 92 in the 1985 Table A and ratification.
Smith v Henniker-Major & Co (a firm) [2002] BCC 544 (Rimer J. – Chancery Division); [2003] Ch 182 (Court of Appeal)
Issues concerning Section 35A of the 1985 Act (now Section 40 of the 2006 Act); ratification; amendment of pleadings post-expiry of limitation period.
Re Sedgefield Steeplechase Co (1927) Ltd [2002] 2 BCLC 211 (Lord Hoffmann – Chancery Division); [2001] BCC 889 (Court of Appeal)
Question arising in a claim and a parallel petition under Section 459 of the 1985 Act (now Section 994 of the 2006 Act) whether pre-emption provisions had been triggered.
Re Ransomes Plc [1999] 1 BCLC 775 (Lloyd J. – Chancery Division); [1999] 2 BCLC 591 (Court of Appeal)
Petition seeking confirmation of cancellation of share premium account, opposed by preference shareholder.